In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- VHRA Updates: Virginia Widens Employer Coverage and Extends Discrimination Complaint Filing Deadlines
- Watch: States Are Now Writing the Workplace AI Rules - Employment Law This Week
- Watch: Hemant Gupta Bridges the Gap Between Cutting-Edge Technology and Intellectual Property Protection
- A Proposed Overhaul to Federal Grantmaking: What It Could Mean for Grantees, Healthcare and Other Researchers, and Colleges and Universities
- Watch: Agencies Step Up DEI Scrutiny, DOL Clarifies Overtime Rules, and California Court Limits PAGA Claims - Employment Law This Week