By Michael Kun
Yesterday, only weeks after its long-awaited Brinker v. Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws.
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that neither party may recover attorney’s fees on claims involving meal and rest periods. The Court analyzed the legislative history of the meal and rest period provisions and concluded, “We believe the most plausible inference to be drawn from history is that the Legislature intended [meal and rest period] claims to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- VHRA Updates: Virginia Widens Employer Coverage and Extends Discrimination Complaint Filing Deadlines
- Watch: States Are Now Writing the Workplace AI Rules - Employment Law This Week
- Watch: Hemant Gupta Bridges the Gap Between Cutting-Edge Technology and Intellectual Property Protection
- A Proposed Overhaul to Federal Grantmaking: What It Could Mean for Grantees, Healthcare and Other Researchers, and Colleges and Universities
- Watch: Agencies Step Up DEI Scrutiny, DOL Clarifies Overtime Rules, and California Court Limits PAGA Claims - Employment Law This Week