For the second time this spring, a California statute designed to promote diversity in corporate boardrooms was blocked by a state judge. On May 13, 2022, in Crest v. Padilla I (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV27561) (Crest), Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis ruled that California Corporations Code Section 301.3 (SB 826), which requires publicly listed corporations in California to have women on their boards, violates the Equal Protection Clause of California’s Constitution. California Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber has since announced plans to appeal the decision, stating that “SB 826 was passed not to remove men from the boardroom, but simply to make room for highly qualified women who have been excluded from the corporate board selection process for decades.”
As featured in #WorkforceWednesday: This week, we focus on compliance and transparency when using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in employment decision-making.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- VHRA Updates: Virginia Widens Employer Coverage and Extends Discrimination Complaint Filing Deadlines
- Watch: States Are Now Writing the Workplace AI Rules - Employment Law This Week
- Watch: Hemant Gupta Bridges the Gap Between Cutting-Edge Technology and Intellectual Property Protection
- A Proposed Overhaul to Federal Grantmaking: What It Could Mean for Grantees, Healthcare and Other Researchers, and Colleges and Universities
- Watch: Agencies Step Up DEI Scrutiny, DOL Clarifies Overtime Rules, and California Court Limits PAGA Claims - Employment Law This Week