A private equity client asked us recently to assess a rumor that FDA was on the warpath in enforcing the 510(k) requirement on medical devices from a particular region. Such a government initiative would significantly deter investments in the companies doing the importing. Turns out, the agency was not. The FDA’s recent activities in the region were well within their historical norms.
But the project got us thinking, what does the agency’s enormous database on import actions tell us about the agency’s enforcement priorities more generally? There are literally thousands of ways to slice and dice the import data set for insights, but we picked just one as an example. We wanted to assess, globally, over the last 20 years, in which therapeutic areas has FDA been enforcing the 510(k) requirement most often?
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Patent Infringement Lawsuit Alleges "Piracy" of AI-Driven Medical Technology
- DOJ Civil Division Accelerates Review of FCA Whistleblower Complaints Involving Federally Funded, State-Administered Benefits Programs
- FDA Warns Against “Over-Reliance” on AI Pharmaceutical Manufacturing . . . But How Much Reliance Is Too Much?
- Five Federal Cases Health Care and Life Sciences GCs Should Continue to Watch in 2026
- CMS Announces Nationwide Moratoria on New Medicare Enrollment for Hospices, Home Health Agencies