Introduction
Let’s say FDA proposed a guidance document that would change the definition of “low cholesterol” for health claims. Now let’s say that when FDA finalized the guidance, instead of addressing that topic, FDA banned Beluga caviar. If you are interested in Beluga caviar, would you think you had adequate opportunity to comment? Would you care if FDA argued that Beluga caviar was high in cholesterol so the two documents were related?
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Medicaid Behavioral Health Investigations and Payment Suspensions in D.C. Are Increasing – How Providers Can Limit Risk
- ‘Emilie’ Is Not a Psychiatrist: Pennsylvania Board of Medicine Alleges Unlawful Practice of Medicine by an AI Chatbot
- DOJ’s West Coast Strike Force to Target Health Care Fraud in Arizona, Nevada, and Northern California
- DOJ FOCUS Initiative Prioritizes “High Quality” Data Miner Actions by FCA Whistleblowers
- FDA Proposal Would Leave Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, and Liraglutide Off 503B Bulks List