Trade Secrets & Employee Mobility

On April 15, 2026, Governor Janet T. Mills signed into law “An Act Relating to Noncompete Agreements Between Employers and Health Care Practitioners,” L.D. 2200 (the “Amendments”).  The Amendments significantly restrict noncompetes for health care practitioners in the State of Maine.  The Amendments apply to all noncompete agreements entered into, or renewed on or after, the Amendments’ effective date of July 13, 2026 (the “Effective Date”).

On March 24, 2026, Governor Spencer J. Cox signed the Healthcare Worker Post-Employment Amendments, House Bill 270 (the “Amendments”) into law. Taking effect on May 6, 2026, the Amendments eliminate, with limited exceptions, post-employment noncompetes in the State of Utah for healthcare workers.

As state legislatures continue to reshape the landscape of restrictive covenants in the wake of federal uncertainty, Texas is one of the latest to amend its existing laws governing non-compete agreements for healthcare workers. Texas Senate Bill (SB) 1318, which takes effect on September 1, 2025, tightens Texas’ already well-regulated statute by further restricting the enforceability standards for physician non-competes and, for the first time, extends similar restrictions to other licensed healthcare practitioners. 

Key Changes to Physician Non-Compete Agreements

In June 2025, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed SB1318 into law, which, effective September 1, 2025, revises Sections 15.50 and 15.52 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code, and adds a new Section 15.501.

In the wake of the nationwide injunction last year barring the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) attempted Noncompete Ban, states have continued to legislate the scope of enforceable restrictive covenants, especially noncompetes. In particular, many states are legislating specific rules for restrictive covenants for certain providers in the healthcare industry. In addition to the other states we previously reported noted, the latest wave of such states to pass legislation regarding noncompetes for health care providers includes Montana, Indiana, Colorado, Oregon, and Utah.

Thomson Reuters Practical Law has released the 2025 Practice Note titled “Health Care Non-Competes,” authored by David J. Clark.

The Note discusses non-compete agreements in the health care sector, examining the legal and policy considerations impacting their enforceability. It highlights the unique challenges posed by health care non-competes, including patient access and continuity of care, and reviews state-specific statutes that restrict or prohibit these agreements for various health care workers. This Note discusses alternative restrictive covenants, such as non-solicitation and non-treatment agreements, and provides insights into the jurisdictional variations in non-compete enforceability. It also addresses ethical concerns raised by health care non-competes, particularly those affecting physicians, and examines the implications of telemedicine and health care deserts on non-compete enforcement. This Note offers guidance on best practices for drafting and enforcing non-competes. It is jurisdiction-neutral but will be useful to employers and their counsel in all jurisdictions.