Posts tagged Cat's Paw.
Blogs
3 minute read
In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Podcast: Non-Competes in 2026 - FTC Signals Major Policy Shift – Employment Law This Week
- In Lawsuits, Facts Matter. Employers That Embrace DEI Can Weather the Storm
- Video: NLRB Shifts Enforcement, DOL’s Non-Union Focus, and EEOC’s DEI Crackdown - Employment Law This Week
- After Ames, the Third Circuit Ends New Jersey’s Background Circumstances Rule for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- SEC Issues New Guidance Under Rule 701 for Employee Equity Compensation