Posts tagged Cat's Paw.
Blogs
3 minute read
In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Watch: Words Matter - How to Draft Arbitration Agreements That Hold Up in Court - Employment Law This Week
- One Nation, One Privacy Law: GOP Introduces Federal Privacy Legislation
- DOL Proposes New Safe Harbor for Selection of Designated Investment Alternatives for Defined Contribution Plans
- Watch: Joint Employment, Misclassification, I-9s, and Web Accessibility - New Rules and Rulings Reshape Employer Risk - Employment Law This Week
- Critical Infrastructure at Risk: Project Glasswing Urges Attention to AI-Driven Cyber-Risks