In the wake of this country’s longest federal shutdown, federal courts were facing unprecedented decision-making whether to stay civil proceedings implicating federal employees and agencies.
The Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits federal agencies from spending beyond their allotted funding and simultaneously restricts federal employees from working on a volunteer basis. The Act provides, in relevant part:
An officer or employee of the United States Government or of the District of Columbia government may not accept voluntary services for either government or employ personal services exceeding that authorized by law except for emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property.
31 U.S.C. § 1342 (emphasis added).
During lapses in federal funding, voluntary services are only authorized in very limited circumstances, but the parameters of the “safety of human life” or “protection of property” exceptions have not been uniformly defined nor applied across the courts.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- State AGs in Action: Health Care Enforcement in 2026 – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
- The DOJ’s New Corporate Enforcement Policy: A Familiar but Now Nationally Unified Framework for Voluntary Self-Disclosure
- The Case Was Settled, but ChatGPT Thought Otherwise: A Dispute Poised to Define AI Legal Liability
- “Claude Is Not an Attorney”: Individuals Risk Abandoning the Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work-Product Doctrine When Consulting AI
- Prediction Markets v. State Gaming Laws: The Kalshi Litigation Gamble