Despite popular opinion, lawyers and judges are human and sometimes the facts of a case make it near impossible for judges to play the role of the modest umpire calling balls and strikes described by Chief Justice Roberts in his confirmation hearing. Sometimes, bad facts make bad law because the plaintiff is so sympathetic that the just ruling may not be the "right" one. Fachon v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al., appears to be the epitome of this.
Earlier this year, a 20-year old man, Eugene Neil Fachon, was diagnosed with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ("DIPG") a form of brain ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- HHS OIG Issues Favorable Advisory Opinion Regarding Surgical Supply Discounts to Ambulatory Surgery Centers in Exchange for Software Purchases
- Health Care Workplace Violence Legislation Heats Up in 2026
- DOGE's Attempt to Crowdsource Medicaid Fraud Scrutiny: Is This the Future of Healthcare Fraud Investigations?
- Feds vs. the States: Dr. Mehmet Oz Announces an Investigation Into New York’s Medicaid Program
- U.S. Supreme Court to Weigh Induced Infringement Case Regarding ‘Generic Version of Vascepa®’