Posts tagged employment litigation.
Blogs
3 minute read
In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Health Care Without the Hospital: ChatGPT Health and Claude Go Direct to Consumers
- The HTI-5 Proposed Rules: ASTP/ONC’s Cleanup and the Hard Work that Lies Ahead
- Just Released: Telemental Health Laws – Download Our Complimentary Survey and App
- OIG Limits Sign-On Bonuses to In-Home Family Caregivers
- Governing Health AI Development and Adoption: Insights from HHS’s Recently Announced Strategy to Promote AI in Healthcare