Posts tagged employment litigation.
Blogs
3 minute read
In employment litigation, plaintiffs often rely on the “cat’s paw” doctrine to hold their employers liable for discriminatory or retaliatory animus of a supervisory employee who influenced, but did not make, the ultimate employment decision. On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc., greatly extended the reach of the “cat’s paw,” holding that the doctrine could be applied to hold an employer liable for an adverse employment decision that was influenced by the discriminatory or ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- HHS OIG Issues Favorable Advisory Opinion Regarding Surgical Supply Discounts to Ambulatory Surgery Centers in Exchange for Software Purchases
- Health Care Workplace Violence Legislation Heats Up in 2026
- DOGE's Attempt to Crowdsource Medicaid Fraud Scrutiny: Is This the Future of Healthcare Fraud Investigations?
- Feds vs. the States: Dr. Mehmet Oz Announces an Investigation Into New York’s Medicaid Program
- U.S. Supreme Court to Weigh Induced Infringement Case Regarding ‘Generic Version of Vascepa®’