On August 13, 2026, Senior U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill of the District of Idaho issued a ruling in Seyb v. Members of the Idaho Board of Medicine, holding that Idaho’s near-total abortion ban is unconstitutional to the extent it prohibits abortions necessary to protect the health—not just the life—of the pregnant patient. Along with that holding, the court entered an injunction barring enforcement of the ban in those circumstances. The ruling is the first federal district court decision since Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization to hold that the U.S. Constitution affirmatively protects a right to health-preserving abortion.
Recent Updates
- Federal Court Holds Idaho’s Near-Total Abortion Ban Unconstitutional for Lack of Health Exception
- HRSA Announces Revised 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program for 2027
- The Department of Justice's National Fraud Enforcement Division: A New Era of Coordinated Fraud Prosecution and What It Means for Corporate America
- When the DOJ Knocks: Takeaways for Podiatrists from APMA 2026
- When AI Becomes Part of Medicine: Why CMS’s AI Questions Matter Now