Behavioral health providers in the District of Columbia (“District” or “D.C.”) are operating in an environment of heightened government scrutiny. In recent months, federal and District authorities have signaled an intensified focus on Medicaid fraud in the behavioral health space, combining criminal prosecutions by the U.S. Attorney’s Office with aggressive program integrity actions by the D.C. Department of Health Care Finance (“DHCF”). These efforts have included criminal and civil investigations into alleged billing irregularities and, at an increasing rate, the suspension of Medicaid payments to providers based on suspected fraud. Such suspensions are implemented in almost all cases, as permitted by regulations, before any final determination on the merits. These developments raise significant legal, financial, and operational risks for behavioral health providers in D.C.
Our colleagues at Epstein Becker Green released a client alert: "DC Circuit Strongly Reaffirms the Applicability of the Attorney-Client Privilege to Internal Compliance Investigations," by George B. Breen, Jonah D. Retzinger, Marshall E. Jackson Jr., and Stuart M. Gerson.
Following is an excerpt:
Especially in the District of Columbia Circuit, the home base for many fraud cases in which the government is opposed to health care providers and defense contractors, there had been considerable doubt that the attorney-client privilege attached to internal compliance ...
Recent Updates
- When AI Becomes Part of Medicine: Why CMS’s AI Questions Matter Now
- Watch: Gender-Affirming Care: What Health Care Providers Need to Know About Federal Enforcement – Thought Leaders in Health Law
- Executive Order 14321 at One Year: Civil Commitment Policy Shifts and Provider Impact
- Watch: FDA’s 2026 Enforcement Priorities: What In-House Counsel Must Know – Thought Leaders in Health Law
- The Future of 340B: New Bills Offer Competing Solutions to Modernize the 340B Drug Discount Program