Background
On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Stull v. Summa, a medical negligence case in which the defendants argued that Ohio’s statutory peer-review privilege protected from discovery the file the hospital maintained on a resident physician, which included, among other things, quality reviews and assessments of the resident’s clinical competency and professional conduct. The Supreme Court of Ohio decided one issue: Does the peer-review privilege in R.C. 2305.252 apply to a health care entity’s files about resident physicians?
This case arose from the medical treatment of head injuries that the patient sustained during a car crash. The patient and his guardians filed a medical negligence lawsuit against the hospital and its employed health care professionals, including a resident physician who participated in the patient’s care. The plaintiffs alleged that the resident improperly intubated the patient, causing the patient to sustain a brain injury.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Health Care Without the Hospital: ChatGPT Health and Claude Go Direct to Consumers
- The HTI-5 Proposed Rules: ASTP/ONC’s Cleanup and the Hard Work that Lies Ahead
- Just Released: Telemental Health Laws – Download Our Complimentary Survey and App
- OIG Limits Sign-On Bonuses to In-Home Family Caregivers
- Governing Health AI Development and Adoption: Insights from HHS’s Recently Announced Strategy to Promote AI in Healthcare