In 2010, as part of the Affordable Care Act, Congress resolved a highly litigated issue about whether a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) can serve as a basis for liability under the federal False Claims Act (FCA). Specifically, Congress amended the AKS to state that a “claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of [the AKS] constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the [FCA].”
This amendment, however, did not end the debate over the relationship between the AKS and the FCA. Over the last several years, multiple courts have been called upon to interpret what it means for a claim to “result from” a violation of the AKS. Courts across the country are split on the correct standard. On February 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit joined the Sixth and Eight Circuits in adopting a stricter “but-for” standard of causation—while the Third Circuit has previously declared that the government must merely prove a causal connection between an illegal kickback and a claim being submitted for reimbursement.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- HHS OIG Issues Favorable Advisory Opinion Regarding Surgical Supply Discounts to Ambulatory Surgery Centers in Exchange for Software Purchases
- Health Care Workplace Violence Legislation Heats Up in 2026
- DOGE's Attempt to Crowdsource Medicaid Fraud Scrutiny: Is This the Future of Healthcare Fraud Investigations?
- Feds vs. the States: Dr. Mehmet Oz Announces an Investigation Into New York’s Medicaid Program
- U.S. Supreme Court to Weigh Induced Infringement Case Regarding ‘Generic Version of Vascepa®’