For employers managing union organizing activity, dress code enforcement, and workplace insignia policies, a federal appeals court has just narrowed how much deference the National Labor Relations Board gets when it rules those policies unlawful.

"Why the Second Circuit Backed Starbucks in Union Dress-Code Dispute," published by International Employment Lawyer, examined the Second Circuit's decision siding with Starbucks in a dispute over employees wearing union insignia, reversing the NLRB's finding that the company's dress code violated federal labor law. Steven M. Swirsky, Member of the Firm of Epstein Becker Green and counsel to employers on labor relations strategy and NLRB proceedings, discussed what the ruling signals for how courts are reviewing the board's interpretations of the National Labor Relations Act.

The court rejected the board's 2022 Tesla standard, which had treated most restrictions on union insignia as presumptively unlawful, finding it conflicted with a 1945 Supreme Court precedent calling for a balance between employee rights and legitimate business interests. Swirsky pointed to the broader shift underway since the Supreme Court ended Chevron deference, noting that courts are now more willing to reach their own conclusions about what the Act means rather than defer to the board.

"While it is clear that, as a result of Loper Bright and the end of Chevron deference, the courts are not going to defer to the NLRB's interpretations of the NLRA as it did previously, the Second Circuit's decision shows that in at least some cases, the courts are likely to engage in de novo review of cases and to formulate their own conclusions as to what the Act means," Swirsky said.

He added that employers should not read the ruling as unlimited license to restrict union imagery, since policies that interfere with employees' right to organize can still be found unlawful.

Get in Touch

To discuss how this shift in judicial deference to the NLRB may affect your organization's dress code and workplace policies, contact Steve Swirsky at sswirsky@ebglaw.com.

Jump to Page
Advanced Search ›

Privacy Preference Center

When you visit any website, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. This information might be about you, your preferences or your device and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalized web experience. Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable information.

Performance Cookies

These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.