Posts tagged California Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Blogs
2 minute read
A recent decision from the Northern District of California, Magic Leap, Inc. v. Bradski et. al., shows that employers must meet a high standard when filing a California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2019.210 disclosure statement under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“CUTSA”). See California Civil Code § 3426 et seq. The disclosure statement, which does not have a counterpart in the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act, requires a plaintiff to “identify the trade secret with reasonable particularity” before it can conduct discovery of the defendants’ evidence ...
Blogs
5 minute read
When an employee leaves his or her employment in California, under what circumstances may a former employee solicit his former employer's customers? Can non-solicitation agreements ever be enforceable under California law?
Blogs
3 minute read
A recent California Court of Appeal decision sheds light on whether certain state law claims are pre-empted under the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act.
Back to Trade Secrets & Employee Mobility Blog
Recent Updates
- Louisiana, Maryland, and Iowa Pass Laws Restricting Noncompetes Specific to Certain Professions
- Delaware Refuses to Blue Pencil Overbroad Restrictive Covenants Following Business Acquisition
- Virginia Senate Bill 128 Adds Health Care Professionals to Virginia’s Noncompete Restrictions
- When the Deal Closes, the Trade Secrets Don't: Enforcing Sale-of-Business Covenants Under Judicial Scrutiny
- Tennessee Enacts New Restrictions on Noncompete Agreements