A recent Opinion issued by the Arizona Supreme Court highlights a noteworthy dichotomy in the way various states interpret the pre-emptive effect of their respective Uniform Trade Secrets Acts (“UTSA”). Forty-eight states have enacted some form of the UTSA, which aims to codify and harmonize standards and remedies regarding misappropriation of trade secrets that had emerged in common law and which differed from state to state. Only New York and Massachusetts have not enacted some form of the UTSA.
One important feature of the UTSA is its pre-emptive effect upon state common law ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Virginia Approves SB170: Expanded Restrictions on Enforcement of Noncompetes Take Effect July 1, 2026
- Spilling Secrets Podcast: Non-Competes in 2026 - FTC Signals Major Policy Shift
- Washington State Bans Almost All Noncompetes
- More Changes Ahead? Virginia May Expand Noncompete Restrictions in July 2026
- Preparing for Non-Compete Litigation: 2026 Update