Workforce Bulletin

As we explained in a previous blog post, last fall, Governor Kathy Hochul signed the New York Retail Worker Safety Act (NYRWSA) into law, obligating employers to provide certain safety measures for retail workers by early March of this year.

But just a few months later, a temporary reprieve came, when lawmakers introduced a bill (“S740” or “the Amendments”) to modify specific details of the original NYRWSA. Just weeks before the original version was to take effect, Governor Hochul signed off on the Amendments, which not only changed some of the law’s original requirements, but also delayed mandatory policy, training, and notice requirements until June 2, 2025.

While portions of our blog post from October 2024 remain accurate, some details have changed. New York retail employers should read on to learn what NYRWSA requires of them, and by when.

As featured in #WorkforceWednesday®: This week, we're covering the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL’s) decision to halt enforcement of the Biden-era independent contractor rule, the upcoming EEO-1 reporting season (starting on May 20), and New York State’s new labor law amendment, reducing damages for first-time frequency-of-pay violations.­

On May 1, 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division (Division) issued Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB) No. 2025-1 (“FAB 2025-1”), announcing that it is currently working to reformulate the test as to how independent contractor status is determined under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  Although it is unclear what contours the revised rule will eventually take, FAB 2025-1 signals a clear intention to make it easier for businesses to classify workers as independent contractors. 

The rulemaking process will take time.  FAB 2025-1 accordingly provides that, during the interim, the DOL will no longer enforce a 2024 rule established under the Biden administration.  The 2024 rule, which consisted of a non-exhaustive multi-factor test, is largely viewed as placing a difficult hurdle with respect to independent contractor classification.

FAB 2025-1 relaxes the DOL enforcement standard by reverting to the “economic reality” framework outlined in Fact Sheet #13 (July 2008), as informed by Opinion Letter FLSA2019-6. The “economic reality” framework asks whether the worker is an independent contractor in business for themselves, or an employee economically dependent on the business they serve. While this does not involve a single rule or test, significant factors include:

[8/28/2025 UPDATE: Following a special session called by Governor Jared Polis, the Colorado legislature passed SB 25B-004 and it was signed by the governor on August 28, 2025. SB 25B-004 will delay the effective date for implementation of SB 24-205, the state’s historic artificial intelligence law, to June 30, 2026, instead of February 1, 2026.]

On May 17, 2024, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed Colorado’s historic artificial intelligence (AI) consumer protection bill, SB 24-205, colloquially known as “Colorado’s AI Act” (“CAIA”), into law. As we noted at the time, CAIA aims to prevent algorithmic discrimination in AI decision-making that affects “consequential decisions”—including those with a material, legal, or similarly significant effect with respect to health care services and employment decision-making. The bill is scheduled to take effect February 1, 2026.

The same day he signed CAIA, however, Governor Polis addressed a “signing statement” letter to Colorado’s General Assembly articulating his reservations. He urged sponsors, stakeholders, industry leaders, and more to “fine tune” the measure over the next two years to sufficiently protect technology, competition, and innovation in the state.

As the local and national political climate steers toward a less restrictive AI policy, Governor Polis drafted another letter to the Colorado legislature. On May 5, 2025, Polis—along with Attorney General Phil Weiser, Denver Mayor Mike Johnston, and others—requested that CAIA’s effective date be delayed until January 2027.

On Wednesday, April 23, 2025, President Trump signed EO 14281, titled Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy (EO), stating a new Trump Administration policy “to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible . . . .”

We, along with several of our colleagues, already explained this EO, but this shift in federal policy—barely noticed by most people amidst myriad controversies, memes, and crypto schemes, as well as a number of other executive orders—is important enough to warrant further consideration by anyone who manages workplaces and those of us who advise employers about civil rights laws. As a cover story in the Sunday, May 11, 2025 issue of the New York Times observed, the EO’s directive to curtail the use of disparate impact liability is part of a larger effort to “purge the consideration of diversity, equity and inclusion, or D.E.I., from the federal government and every facet of American life. . . .” and focuses on “the nation’s bedrock civil rights law.”

On May 9, 2025, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury (collectively, “the Departments”) asked the D.C. federal court to suspend a lawsuit to challenge the legality of the 2024 Rule on the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) while the Departments consider whether to rescind or modify the 2024 Rule.^[1] On May 15, 2025, the Departments released a public statement that they will not enforce the 2024 Final Rule prior to a final decision in the litigation, plus an additional 18 months after the decision.

The public statement on May 15 provides further details regarding the scope of the non-enforcement policy, including clarification that the 2013 MHPAEA rules remain in effect, as does plans’ obligation to develop comparative analyses of non-quantitative treatment limits (“NQTLs”). However, the Departments have not yet provided any indication of the timeline for publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking to rescind or modify the 2024 Rule, and most likely it will take some time for the Departments to determine how exactly the new rule should be designed to better implement the statutory requirements.

Effective May 8, 2025, New York City employers with four or more employees must physically post a copy of their written lactation policy in an area accessible to employees as well as on its intranet if one exists.

This new posting obligation is an addition to the City’s requirement that covered employers maintain a written lactation room accommodation policy that must be provided to new employees upon hire and New York State’s requirement to provide the policy annually. The City enacted legislation on November 9, 2024, effective 180 days later, amending existing provisions to require covered employers to make their written policies readily available to employees.

In addition, the legislation amended the ordinance to reflect 2024 changes in New York State law (explained in detail here) requiring employers to provide at least 30 minutes of paid break time for breast milk expression. While the New York City ordinance covers only New York City employers with four or more employees, be aware that obligations for paid lactation breaks under New York State Labor Law § 206-c apply to all employers in New York State.

The complex web of federal and state wage and hour laws create potentially devastating risk of exposure for employers.  Years of possible liability for yet unknown claims, liquidated damages, shifting attorneys’ fees, not to mention the risk of class or collective suit, can quickly transform seemingly minor and technical irregularities into expensive complications.  And for companies that partner with other entities to meet their staffing needs, resolving this risk of liability is a critical piece of their business operations.

Quite often, the quick solution for this concern is through a traditional business arrangement: contractual indemnification.  Shifting risk of loss via contract is fairly standard, especially as courts generally enforce the unambiguous terms of the parties’ agreement.  Yet employers should take note of a concerning trend among courts across the country, which have in some cases refused to enforce indemnification agreements in Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) matters on public policy grounds.

As featured in #WorkforceWednesday: This week, on our Spilling Secrets podcast series, our panelists discuss the ins and outs of trying trade secret cases in a courtroom.

What’s the secret to winning a trade secret trial? Find out in this compelling episode of Spilling Secrets, where Epstein Becker Green attorneys Katherine G. Rigby, James P. Flynn, and Adam Paine break down the art of navigating these high-stakes cases.

From designing winning courtroom tactics and leveraging key witnesses to using storytelling as a tool to clarify complex trade secret claims, our panelists offer actionable insights and essential tips for safeguarding confidentiality and determining the right trial format to secure the best outcomes for your business.

In a surprisingly employer-friendly decision, the California Court of Appeal recently held that voluntary, prospective written meal waivers for shorter shifts, i.e., those that are more than five but no more than six hours in total, are valid and enforceable.  In Bradsbery v. Vicar Operating, Inc., the Court of Appeal held that revocable, prospective meal waivers for shorter shifts are enforceable in the absence of any evidence the waivers are unconscionable or unduly coercive.

Case Background

Plaintiffs, former veterinary assistants and technicians, filed a putative class action in July 2014 against their former employer, Vicar Operating.  Plaintiffs alleged in part that Vicar Operating had violated Labor Code section 512(a) by requiring Plaintiffs and putative class members to work shifts between five and six hours without a meal period and without waiving their right to a meal period by mutual consent.  Plaintiffs argued that as a result, Vicar owed Plaintiffs and the putative class members premiums for missed meal periods.