Once again seemingly appropriate work rules have been under attack by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). In a recent decision (Component Bar Products, Inc. and James R. Stout, Case 14-CA-145064), two members of a three-member NLRB panel upheld an August 7, 2015 decision by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) finding that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or the “Act”) by maintaining overly broad handbook rules and terminating an employee who was engaged in “protected, concerted activity” when he called another ...
A recent National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decision by an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found numerous violations of the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) stemming from the reaction of a mortgage brokerage firm to a conversation in which one of its bankers used profanity and complained about a client in an office restroom. While this decision may seem extreme to some, it is also an example of the expansive view that the NLRB is taking in deciding what types of employee communication and activities, particularly with respect to non-unionized workforces ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Podcast: Non-Competes in 2026 - FTC Signals Major Policy Shift – Employment Law This Week
- In Lawsuits, Facts Matter. Employers That Embrace DEI Can Weather the Storm
- Video: NLRB Shifts Enforcement, DOL’s Non-Union Focus, and EEOC’s DEI Crackdown - Employment Law This Week
- After Ames, the Third Circuit Ends New Jersey’s Background Circumstances Rule for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- SEC Issues New Guidance Under Rule 701 for Employee Equity Compensation