Employees who resign from work, sue their employer, and assert “constructive discharge” shoulder a heavy burden to demonstrate that they had no choice but to resign. A recent decision of the Massachusetts Appeals Court, Armato v. Town of Stoneham, shows just how heavy that burden is.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: “Stay or Pay” Agreements, Developing Immigration News, EEOC Power Shift - Employment Law This Week
- New York’s Trapped at Work Act, in Effect for Now, but New Bill Aims to Amend Terms and Extend Effective Date
- Video: How Jonathan Brenner Delivers Creative Legal Solutions for California Employers
- Video: FMLA and FLSA Compliance in 2026—New DOL Opinion Letters and Emerging Risks - Employment Law This Week
- Federal Shutdowns and Workplace Law: Navigating Legal Uncertainty