A recent New York state court decision granted a fairly unique petition to disqualify the attorney for a group of former employees from representing them in an intra-industry arbitration at FINRA. Why? Because the lawyer had turned himself into a fact witness by negotiating the termination explanation in the U5 notice of two of the employees. The decision raises an interesting question about whether the same logic could be applied in a U5 expungement hearing at FINRA when there have been discussions between counsel about the U5 language, regardless of whether ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: “Stay or Pay” Agreements, Developing Immigration News, EEOC Power Shift - Employment Law This Week
- New York’s Trapped at Work Act, in Effect for Now, but New Bill Aims to Amend Terms and Extend Effective Date
- Video: How Jonathan Brenner Delivers Creative Legal Solutions for California Employers
- Video: FMLA and FLSA Compliance in 2026—New DOL Opinion Letters and Emerging Risks - Employment Law This Week
- Federal Shutdowns and Workplace Law: Navigating Legal Uncertainty