By Michael Kun
Yesterday, only weeks after its long-awaited Brinker v. Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws.
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that neither party may recover attorney’s fees on claims involving meal and rest periods. The Court analyzed the legislative history of the meal and rest period provisions and concluded, “We believe the most plausible inference to be drawn from history is that the Legislature intended [meal and rest period] claims to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Watch: 401(k) Alternative Assets, NLRB Removal Protections, and Military Leave Requests - Employment Law This Week
- Watch: Employer AI Headaches - Job Postings, Client Privilege, and Microchip Bans - Employment Law This Week
- Video: Is Cemex Still Valid? Sixth Circuit Creates Uncertainty - Employment Law This Week
- Podcast: Non-Competes in 2026 - FTC Signals Major Policy Shift – Employment Law This Week
- In Lawsuits, Facts Matter. Employers That Embrace DEI Can Weather the Storm