By Michael Kun
Yesterday, only weeks after its long-awaited Brinker v. Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws.
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that neither party may recover attorney’s fees on claims involving meal and rest periods. The Court analyzed the legislative history of the meal and rest period provisions and concluded, “We believe the most plausible inference to be drawn from history is that the Legislature intended [meal and rest period] claims to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Watch: EEO-1 Reports, Remote Work, and Non-Compete Restrictions in Tennessee - Employment Law This Week
- Chicago Paid Leave Rules Clarified and Now in Effect
- Chicago Recalibrates Fair Workweek Rules, Which Took Effect June 1
- Illinois’ Proposed Notice Rules for Complying with Workplace AI Anti-Discrimination Law
- Inside Colorado’s Senate Bill 26-189: Impacts and Implications for Employers