By Michael Kun
Yesterday, only weeks after its long-awaited Brinker v. Superior Court decision, the California Supreme Court issued another important ruling on California meal and rest period laws.
In Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that neither party may recover attorney’s fees on claims involving meal and rest periods. The Court analyzed the legislative history of the meal and rest period provisions and concluded, “We believe the most plausible inference to be drawn from history is that the Legislature intended [meal and rest period] claims to ...
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Attention Connecticut Warehouse Employers: Deadline for New Quota Notices Approaching
- New Jersey Department of Labor’s Guidance Clarifies Expanded Job Protected Leave Rights for Employees
- New York City Publishes Final Rules Related to the Earned Safe and Sick Time Act
- Watch: Beyond the EEOC - the Widening Divide in Disparate Impact Enforcement - Employment Law This Week
- The Death of Disparate Impact? What Recent DOJ Guidance Signals to Employers