On March 6, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a significant decision clarifying how discrimination claims brought by majority-group plaintiffs should be analyzed under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD). In Massey v. Borough of Bergenfield, the court concluded that majority-group plaintiffs should not be required to satisfy the “background circumstances” rule—a doctrine that imposed a heightened burden on plaintiffs alleging discrimination against majority groups. In reaching that conclusion, the court, predicting that the New Jersey Supreme Court would do the same, relied on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, which rejected the background circumstances rule in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) cases. Massey marks the first federal appellate decision to apply Ames to state law.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Video: NLRB Shifts Enforcement, DOL’s Non-Union Focus, and EEOC’s DEI Crackdown - Employment Law This Week
- After Ames, the Third Circuit Ends New Jersey’s Background Circumstances Rule for Reverse Discrimination Claims
- SEC Issues New Guidance Under Rule 701 for Employee Equity Compensation
- Video: NLRB and DOL Take Action on Joint Employer and Independent Contractor Rules - Employment Law This Week
- Massachusetts Court Rejects Individual Liability and Aiding-and-Abetting Claims Under Paid Family and Medical Leave Law