The Fourth Circuit recently reaffirmed that not all forms of opposition constitute protected activity. In Bills v. WVNH EMP, LLC, the Fourth Circuit unanimously affirmed the Southern District of West Virginia’s Order granting Defendants WVNH EMP, LLC, and Lanette Kuhnash’s (“Defendants”) motion for summary judgment on plaintiff Dorothy Bills’ (“Bills”) wrongful termination action under the West Virginia Human Rights Act (“WVHRA”). The sole issue was whether Bills engaged in protected activity under the WVHRA when she opposed sexual harassment by hitting a patient to stop him from groping her. Both courts agreed that Bills’ conduct was not protected by the WVHRA.
Blog Editors
Recent Updates
- Watch: 401(k) Alternative Assets, NLRB Removal Protections, and Military Leave Requests - Employment Law This Week
- Watch: Employer AI Headaches - Job Postings, Client Privilege, and Microchip Bans - Employment Law This Week
- Video: Is Cemex Still Valid? Sixth Circuit Creates Uncertainty - Employment Law This Week
- Podcast: Non-Competes in 2026 - FTC Signals Major Policy Shift – Employment Law This Week
- In Lawsuits, Facts Matter. Employers That Embrace DEI Can Weather the Storm